West Sage Lane,Tarzana.
Four houses on a four-lot parcel map in Tarzana, all built in 2017. Four is the whole of it: this is a short run of new-build houses, not a large development, and this page does not describe it as one. Every figure was read from the County Assessor on the date shown beside it.
Quick Answer
What is West Sage Lane, Tarzana?
West Sage Lane in Tarzana is four houses. Los Angeles County records them as Lots A, B, C and D of Parcel Map 324-4-6, and the Assessor shows all four built in 2017 on lots of roughly 7,150 to 7,650 square feet, zoned LAR1.
Four houses is the entire community. Nothing on this page should be read as describing an enclave, an estate section or an inventory of homes, because the recorded map created four lots and four is what stands there. Three of the four carry a Sage Lane address; the fourth is addressed on Avenida Oriente.
The houses on the adjoining Columbus Circle are a separate recorded subdivision, Tract 66292, and are not part of this parcel map. Everything below is either what the Assessor publishes, with a link and the date it was read, or a plain statement that something could not be confirmed.
Where the Name Comes From
The street name as the Los Angeles County Assessor writes it in the situs address on each parcel. It is a street, not a named development; no authority publishes a project name for these four lots.
What the PublicRecord Shows.
Each line is what a named authority publishes, with the page it came from and the date it was read. Nothing is estimated, and nothing comes from a listing portal.
- Recorded as
- Parcel Map 324-4-6, Lots A through D
- The Assessor’s legal description on each of the four parcels reads "P M 324-4-6" followed by that parcel’s lot letter. A parcel map is a small subdivision, recorded separately from the larger tract maps either side of it.
- Source: Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, parcel detail · Verified September 25, 2026
- Assessor parcel numbers
- 2161-023-025 through 2161-023-028
- Four consecutive Assessor parcels, one per lot, created in 2004. Each is a fee parcel carrying one single-family residence.
- Source: Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, parcel detail · Verified September 25, 2026
- Lots on the recorded map
- 4
- Lots A, B, C and D. Four is the complete parcel map; there is no fifth lot and no further phase in the Assessor’s records for it.
- Source: Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, parcel detail · Verified September 25, 2026
- Houses standing today
- 4
- All four parcels are active, each with a use type of single-family residence and a unit count of one. Three are addressed on Sage Lane and one on Avenida Oriente.
- Source: Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, parcel detail · Verified September 25, 2026
- Years built
- 2017
- The Assessor carries a year built of 2017 on all four parcels, although the parcel map itself dates from 2004. A year built describes original construction and says nothing about later work.
- Source: Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, parcel detail · Verified September 25, 2026
- Use type
- Single Family Residence
- Each house sits on its own fee parcel. These are not condominiums and not airspace units.
- Source: Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, parcel detail · Verified September 25, 2026
- Zoning
- LAR1
- The same designation on all four parcels. Zoning governs what may be built, not what stands there; the City of Los Angeles is the authority on the current designation for any one parcel.
- Source: Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, parcel detail · Verified September 25, 2026
- Lot sizes
- 7,156 to 7,662 square feet
- The smallest and largest of the four lots as the Assessor reports them. Three of the four are within about 500 square feet of each other, so these are substantially similar lots.
- Source: Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, parcel detail · Verified September 25, 2026
- Streets
- Sage Lane, Avenida Oriente
- Three of the four parcels carry a Sage Lane situs address and the fourth carries an Avenida Oriente one. The Assessor gives the situs city as Los Angeles on these parcels rather than Tarzana, which is normal: Tarzana is a district of the City of Los Angeles and the Assessor is inconsistent about which it prints.
- Source: Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, parcel detail · Verified September 25, 2026
- What is not part of it
- Columbus Circle, which is Tract 66292: six separate lots, also built in 2017
- The adjoining Columbus Circle houses were recorded under their own subdivision map and carry the legal description "TR=66292", not "P M 324-4-6". They were built in the same year, which makes them easy to confuse with these four, and they are a different recorded project. This page does not cover them.
- Source: Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, parcel detail · Verified September 25, 2026
Not Published, and Why
Things a buyer would expect to see here that no authority confirmed on the date this page was reviewed. A number or a claim that cannot be checked is worse than no answer at all.
Whether there is a gate on West Sage Lane, or any controlled access
No Assessor or City source consulted says anything about access to the street. The public record does not address it at all, in either direction. Aryan’s own firsthand note on this is further down the page and is labelled as his; it is not a public-record fact and should not be relied on as one.
Whether the street is private, and who maintains it
Nothing in the parcel data establishes public or private ownership of Sage Lane, or who is responsible for maintaining or resurfacing it. Ask the City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering and read the recorded parcel map.
Whether there is a homeowners association, and what it governs
No association covering these four lots was confirmed from the California Secretary of State on the date this page was reviewed. Four houses is small enough that shared costs may be handled by a recorded maintenance agreement rather than a corporation, or by nothing at all. Nothing is stated until a document is obtained.
Dues, assessments or shared maintenance costs
No association document or maintenance agreement was obtained, so no figure appears here. Where a small number of houses share anything at all, the cost of it is divided among very few owners, which is a question to ask rather than an amount this page can supply.
Covenants, conditions and restrictions
Any recorded declaration or maintenance agreement for Parcel Map 324-4-6 was not retrieved from the County Registrar-Recorder. What it does and does not restrict is therefore unknown to this page. It can be ordered from that office.
The builder, and whether the four houses share a design or a warranty
The Assessor records a year built, not a builder. Nothing was confirmed about who built them, whether they were built as one project, or whether any construction warranty was given or has any time left on it.
Current asking prices or availability
This is a reference page about a recorded parcel map, not an inventory page. With four houses in total, any statement about availability would be both stale and, in practice, about identifiable homes.
If you own here and can supply the recorded documents, Aryan will add what they show, attributed to the document and dated.
Aryan’s Own Observations, Not the Public Record
These are not public-record facts and they carry no link, because the source is Aryan himself rather than a county or city system. They are kept apart from the table above so the two are never mistaken for each other, and each one states what the public record does and does not establish.
- The gate
- Aryan has worked on this street twice and recalls a gate at its entrance. That is his firsthand recollection from being there, nothing more.
- What the public record says: The public record does not address this. No Assessor or City source consulted says whether there is a gate, who owns it, who maintains it or what it costs to run, and none of those things can be inferred from the parcel data. If it matters to your decision, confirm it on a visit and in writing from the seller, and do not take it from this page. For the same reason the words used in this page’s title, heading, description and structured data describe only what the record establishes.
- Source: Aryan Rabizadeh, from working on the street
Have you closed a sale in West Sage Lane?
Yes, two closings here.
Aryan represented both the buyer and the seller.
Role on the closed transactions record: Listing and Buyer's Agent · Closed 2024 · MLS SR24127533
Aryan represented the buyer.
Role on the closed transactions record: Buyer's Agent · Closed 2022 · MLS 22129477
No house is identified and none will be: on a community this size a street number identifies a client’s home. Each sale is listed with its role, closing month and price alongside every other closed sale on the closed transactions record.
Two closings on a street of four houses means Aryan has been inside this parcel map twice and has read its paperwork twice. That is the whole of the claim. It is not a statement about market share, about pricing, or about what a future sale here would do, and with four houses in total no such statement could be made without describing identifiable homes.
On the 2024 sale he represented both sides. Dual representation is lawful in California with the written, informed consent of both parties, and it changes what an agent may and may not do for each of them. It is named here plainly rather than described as a listing.
Both are listed with his role, the closing month and the price alongside every other closed sale on the closed transactions page. Neither house is identified and neither will be.
Before You Call
What to check before buying in West Sage Lane
This list matters more on a small parcel map than on a large tract, because with four houses any shared cost is divided among four owners and any disagreement is a disagreement among four households. Several items on it are exactly the questions this page could not answer from public sources.
- Whether anything is actually shared, and under what documentFour houses may share a street, a gate, drainage, lighting or nothing. Find the recorded document that says so, whether that is a declaration, a reciprocal easement or a maintenance agreement, and read it rather than relying on how the street looks.
- Who pays for shared maintenance, how an assessment is agreed, and how a decision gets madeWith very few owners there may be no reserve fund, no budget and no board. That is not necessarily a problem, but it means an unexpected repair is a conversation rather than a line item. Ask how the last shared expense was handled.
- Any gate: who owns it, who services it, what replacing it costsWhere a gate exists, its mechanism, power supply and any access system are an ongoing cost, and across four households there is no economy of scale. Ask what is collected for it, what happens when it fails, and who holds the service contract.
- Road and drainage responsibilityIf the street is privately maintained, resurfacing is an owner cost shared four ways. If it is public, the City schedules it. Confirm which with the City of Los Angeles and from the recorded map.
- Covenants and any architectural restrictionRecorded restrictions can govern additions, exterior changes, landscaping, parking and rentals. Read the recorded declaration itself, not a summary, and ask what has been approved or refused since the houses were built.
- Insurance, and what any shared policy does not coverEach owner insures their own house. If there is shared property, confirm what is insured, by whom, and whether the premium is collected from the owners or simply owed by them.
- Lender treatment of the projectDetached houses on fee parcels normally finance as ordinary houses. Where a shared arrangement exists a lender may still want to see it. Ask your lender early what they will need so it is not found late in escrow.
- Construction age and what a 2017 house still has warranty onHouses this age are past most builder warranty periods and into the first round of real maintenance on roofing, systems and finishes. Inspect on that basis rather than on the assumption that new means unexamined.
- The seller’s disclosure packageCalifornia requires delivery of the governing documents where an association exists, and a seller must disclose known shared obligations in any case. Request everything early; if it is slow to appear, that is itself information.
This is general information, not legal, tax, lending or insurance advice. Confirm current requirements with the relevant agency, your lender and your own professionals.
Shared-ownership diligence is covered properly elsewhere rather than repeated here: the condo and townhome guide on the four documents that decide a purchase, and the Resource Center for the agency behind each rule, with the date each link was checked.
If you own here and are thinking about selling.
Aryan has run a sale on this street from the listing side, so this part is firsthand rather than general. The difficulty of pricing here is that there are four houses, which is not enough of a sample to price from. The parcel map, the year built and the lot sizes are close enough that the four are genuinely comparable to each other, and thin enough that an appraiser will have to look outside them. That cuts both ways and it is worth understanding before a number is chosen.
What nobody can tell you is that a particular price will produce a particular result. One street’s history does not predict the next sale, and with four houses the history is short. What Aryan will do is show you the evidence he is reading and why he reads it that way, in writing, before anything is listed.
Pin down what is shared before you list, not in escrow.
This page could not confirm from public sources whether there is an association here, what any recorded declaration restricts, who maintains the street, or what arrangement covers anything shared. A buyer will ask all of it. If you own here you can establish the answers in days, and having the documents in hand before listing removes the commonest source of delay.
It matters more here than on a large tract. On a street of four houses, one closing becomes the comparable the next appraisal is measured against, and an unanswered question about a shared cost is a question a buyer will price in rather than ignore.
Aryan will review the recorded documents with you and give you a written pricing and selling review built on the homes yours actually competes with.
Ask Aryan AboutThis Community.
Send the question and Aryan will tell you which agency or document decides it, and what he can and cannot confirm. If he does not know, he will say so rather than guess.
He works with clients in English, Farsi, Spanish and Hebrew.
About ThisCommunity.
How many houses are on West Sage Lane?
Four. Los Angeles County records them as Lots A, B, C and D of Parcel Map 324-4-6, confirmed from the Assessor parcel records on 25 September 2026. Four is the complete parcel map. Three of the four carry a Sage Lane address and the fourth is addressed on Avenida Oriente.
When were they built?
All four in 2017, according to the year built the Assessor carries on each parcel, although the parcel map itself was recorded in 2004. A year built describes original construction only and says nothing about any later work on an individual house.
Is there a gate on West Sage Lane?
The public record does not address it. No Assessor or City source consulted says whether there is a gate, who owns or maintains one, or what it costs to run. Aryan has worked on the street twice and recalls a gate at the entrance; that is his firsthand recollection, it is labelled as his on this page, and it is not a public-record fact. If it matters to your decision, confirm it on a visit and in writing from the seller.
Are the Columbus Circle houses part of it?
No. Columbus Circle is a separate recorded subdivision, Tract 66292, of six lots, and its parcels carry the legal description "TR=66292" rather than "P M 324-4-6". The houses there were also built in 2017, which makes the two easy to confuse. They are a different recorded project and this page does not cover them.
How big are the lots, and what is the zoning?
The four lots run from 7,156 to 7,662 square feet, and the Assessor carries LAR1 on all four, read 25 September 2026. Three of the four are within about 500 square feet of each other. Zoning governs what may be built rather than what stands there, and the City of Los Angeles is the authority on the current designation for any individual parcel.
Is there a homeowners association or a monthly cost?
Unconfirmed, and therefore unstated. No association covering these four lots was confirmed from the California Secretary of State on the date this page was reviewed, and no maintenance agreement or association document was obtained, so no figure appears here. With four houses, any shared cost is divided among four owners, which makes it a question worth answering in writing before you commit.
Has Aryan sold houses here?
Yes, two. On a 2024 sale he represented both the buyer and the seller, recorded under MLS number SR24127533, and on a 2022 sale he represented the buyer, recorded under MLS number 22129477. Both are listed with his role, the closing month and the price on the closed transactions page. Neither house is identified, because on a street of four houses a street number identifies a client’s home.
Why does this page not say more about the street itself?
Because the Assessor publishes parcel facts, not street facts, and nothing else consulted addressed the street. Access, ownership of the roadway, maintenance and any shared arrangement are all listed on this page as unconfirmed rather than guessed at. Where Aryan knows something firsthand it is attributed to him and marked as not being part of the public record.
The OthersOn This Site.
Recorded communities and condominium projects are not interchangeable, and several sit close to each other. Each page covers one recorded map or one building and nothing else.
West Sage Lane is four houses on a four-lot parcel map, all built in 2017. The other community covered on this site, Monte Verde Estates, is thirty houses across three streets recorded as Tract 52098 and built between 2001 and 2006. They are different recorded maps and different orders of magnitude, and neither page describes the other. The adjoining Columbus Circle is a third, separate recorded subdivision, Tract 66292, which this site does not cover.
- Monte Verde Estates, Tarzana
30 houses, built 2001 to 2006. Recorded as Tract 52098.
Condominium Buildings on This Site
- 5400 Lindley Ave, Encino
- 5420 Lindley Ave, Encino
- 18645 Hatteras St, Tarzana
- 5616 Etiwanda Ave, Tarzana
- 855 S Wooster St, Los Angeles
For the wider area rather than one recorded map, the Tarzana market page and Aryan’s portfolio and documented work are the better places to start.
Sources & Scope
- Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, parcel detail
- Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, parcel detail
- Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, parcel detail
Aryan Rabizadeh is a licensed California real estate salesperson, not an attorney, accountant, lender, engineer, surveyor or insurance professional. Nothing on this page is legal, tax, lending, insurance or engineering advice, and nothing here substitutes for the recorded documents or a current title report. Public records are recorded for assessment and permitting purposes and can be incomplete or out of date; confirm anything that matters to your decision with the relevant agency, the seller and your own professionals.
Written and reviewed by Aryan Rabizadeh, Real Estate Agent · CA DRE #02077236 · Rise Real Estate Group | Real Brokerage Technologies, Inc.
Last reviewed September 25, 2026